Email Exchanges between Indian National Congress and Myself – Part 2

Dear Anup,
Media reports have indicated that Shri Narendra Modi is spending Rs 5,000 crore to advertise his Prime Ministerial ambitions. The total expenditure in the campaign is estimated at Rs 10,000 crore.
This is more what US President Barack Obama spent in his Election campaign.
Have you ever wondered where all this money is coming from?
Everyone knows how the Adani’s empire has grown under Mr Modi’s benevolence.
He claims that he would banish corruption from India but he needs to answer these three simple questions before any Indian can even believe a single word of his sermons.
 1. Why was land given to Adanis at the rate of Rs. 2.5 to 25 per sq. m. when market rate is 1000 to 1500 per sq. m.?
2. Why did he agree to pay 63 paise per unit more than market rate for power to the Adanis, leading to a loss of Rs 23,625 crore to Gujarat.?
3. Why did he give 9,558 acres of land in and around Kutch, without competitive bidding, at less than Rs. 1.29 lakh per acre, to the Adanis. The Adanis resold it to the Indian Oil Corporation at Rs. 29 lakh per acre?
We would be grateful if you could please ask these three simple questions to your nearest Modi supporter. Please let us know if they have any answers.
Read more about this here
Digital Team,

Indian National Congress


My Reply:

To start with, I am not a supporter of any party. But I only want to see our country, India to progress.

Realistically speaking no political person is clean in our country. And sometimes it makes me wonder, whether democracy is something we should strive for. Anyways lets keep that for another discussion.

There are two types of marketing, positive and negative. Positive marketing is where you keep telling about all the good things that your product does, the benefits of using your product and etc etc. Negative marketing is where you do not say anything about your product but keeps talking about the limitation and problems with your competitor. And this is exactly what what you are doing.

Lets talk what have you achieved.

  1. Food Security Bill and some JawaharLal Nehru Rural Bill (sorry I do not remember the exact name)
    • These bills are the worst of its kind. This may make people to vote for you but this works against country. Due to these bills, there is shortage of labor force in India. Companies are struggling to find unskilled workers. Food security bill gives them almost free food while the other bill gives them money for absolutely doing nothing. Explain me, how will a country progress. History has proved many times that giving things free just proves against the development. But anyways, you do not care about the country as long as your deep pockets are filled.
  2. You talk about secularism.
    • India is the only country in the world that gives subsidiary for Haj pilgrimage. If you are really secular, then please provide subsidiary for Vatican visits. Also provide subsidiary for people who goes to “Char Dham”. Personally, I do not care which religion gets what subsidiary but Indians are religious. This strategy is creating conflicts between people. This is divisive politics.
  3. Lets talk about Robert Vadra.
    • How can a person make so much money in so less time? He might be smart and intelligent and knows how to make money. I request Mr. Vadra to let India know, how to quickly make money. Our country will be super rich very soon and there won’t be any problems left in the country. Please ask him.
    • And why does he get special benefits in all Indian airports? He is not a public servant but still India keeps showering special benefits on him. Why he is not allowed for security check and all the other formalities? I have a picture of the notice that was displayed in Mumbai airport, I can send it to you.

Now lets answer some of your questions.

If Modi is giving some subsidiary to an industrialist, it is better for India. How? Industrialist build up industries which in turn generates employment and helps build the economy and raise paying capability of very individual. On the contrary, you guys just cheat and loot and put up your money in Swiss banks or other tax havens. Your government couldn’t even increase the road infrastructure in the last 10 years, forget about setting industries and creating employment.

Finally lets analyze and you will get your answer, choose Modi, who in turn will give benefits to big Industrialist which will setup industries and create employment and boost our economy or choose Gandhi, who will give benefits to Vadra and Varda does nothing.


Email Exchanges between Indian National Congress and Myself – Part 1

प्रिय मित्र,
आजकल कुछ राजनीतिक दल भ्रष्टाचार मिटाने के नाम पर आपका समर्थन मांग रहें हैं। भ्रष्टाचार के मामलों में सच जानना आपका अधिकार भी है और कर्तव्य भी। हमारा आग्रह इतना ही है कि राजनीतिक दलों के दावों और आरोपों की जांच अवश्य करें और सही फैसला लें।
कृप्या इन बिन्दुओं पर ध्यान दें और पूरी जांच करनें के बाद ही अपना वोट डालें।
  • जहां कांग्रेस 2005 में RTI कानून लाई, गुजरात में अमित जेठवा जैसे RTI कार्यकर्ताओं की हत्या कर दी जाती है, जिसमें भाजपा के     नेताओं के नाम स्पष्ट रुप से शामिल हैं। Source
  • कांग्रेस लोकपाल बिल लाई जबकी गुजरात में 10 साल तक लोकायुक्त की नियुक्ति नहीं की गई। जब राज्यपाल ने लोकायुक्त को नियुक्ति किया तो राज्य सरकार ने इसको किसी भी तरह से रोकने के लिए मुक्द्दमें में 45 करोड़ खर्च किए। Source
  • Supreme Court ने गुजरात सरकार की मंत्री आनंदी बेन पटेल को एक जमीन आवंटन के मामले में दोषी पाया पर वो आज भी गुजरात सरकार में मंत्री बनी हुई हैं। Source
  • 400 करोंड़ के मछली पालन घोटाले में कोर्ट द्वारा दोषी पाए गए पुरुषोत्तम सोलंकी गुजरात मंत्रीमंडल को आज भी सुशोभित कर रहे हैं। Source
  • जहां कांग्रेस ने दोषियों के खिलाफ कार्यवाही की, भ्रष्टाचार के मामले में जेल यात्रा कर चुके यदुरप्पा को भाजपा पार्टी में फिर शामिल किया। Source
  • कोयला आंवटन के मामले में हमेशा के लिए एक पारदर्शी नीति बनाने की नीयत से UPA सरकार नें Coal Blocks  के निलामी (auction) का फैसला लिया था। CAG ने कहा है कि auction की नीति देर से लागू की गई, जिसके कारण ‘private parties’ को 1.86 lakh crore का फायदा हुआ था। ऐसा इसलिए हुआ क्योंकि राज्य सरकारों के दबाव के कारण भारत सरकार को 1993 की ही नीति को जबरन अपनाना पड़ा। ध्यान रहे कि इस नीति में भाजपा ने अपने 6.5 साल के शासनकाल में कोई बदलाव नहीं किया।
  • जब नीति पुरानी थी और एक भी खान में खनन नहीं हुआ तो देश को नुक्सान कैसे हुआ। Source
  • CBI उन मामलों की जांच कर रही है, जिसमें सरकारी विभाग के अधिकारियों ने procedures का पालन नहीं किया और कानून दोषियों को सजा देगा।
  • 2G आवंटन मामलें में भी कहानी कुछ ऐसी ही है। इस मामलें के दो पहलू हैं, पहला सरकार की नीति क्या थी और दूसरा ए राजा ने किस तरह से इस नीति को लागू किया।
  • राजा के खिलाफ मामला कोर्ट में है और अगर कोई अपराध हुआ है तो उन्हे कड़ी से कड़ी सजा मिलेगी।
  • जहां तक नीति का सवाल है, यह वही नीति है जो NDA के समय से लागू है और इसका लक्ष्य यह है कि देश के लोग सस्ते दामों पर Mobile phone की सुविधा का लाभ उठा सकें।
  • CAG का आरोप है कि auction न करके हमने देश का नुक्सान किया है पर सरकार की नीति का मक्सद लोगों तक सस्ती मोबाइल सुविधा उपलब्ध करना था, न कि auction कर के राजस्व इक्ठ्ठा करना। UPA सरकार ने 3G सेवाओं को auction करके देश के लिए संसाधन जुटाए जबकि 2G सेवाओं का इस्तेमाल देश का गरीब से गरीब आदमी कर सकता है। जहां तक नीति का सवाल है, उससे देश के करोड़ों लोगों को आगे बढ़ने के अवसर मिलें हैं। Source
  • Common Wealth Games के आरोपी सुरेश कलमाड़ी को हमारी सरकार ने भारतीय ऑलंपिक संध के अध्यक्ष पद से हटाया और अब उनपर कोर्ट में मुक्द्दमा चल रहा है। वहीं जेल की यात्रा कर चुके श्री येदुरप्पा को भाजपा ने अपने मंच से सम्मानित किया, जबकि कांग्रेस ने सुरेश कलमाड़ी का टिकट काट दिया।
चुनाव के शोर में सच कई बार सुनाई नहीं देता खासकर जब शोर करने वाला झूठ बोलने में माहिर हो। हम आपको सच बतानें की कोशिश तो कर ही रहें हैं पर आपका भी फर्ज हैं कि आप अपने स्तर पर सच की जांच करें और सोच समझकर फैसला लें।
अगर आप इन तथ्यों से सहमत हैं तो कृप्या इसे अपने मित्रों से शेयर जरुर करें।
जय हिंद,

भारतीय राष्ट्रीय कांग्रेस



My Reply…..

Good email but too little too late.
Some arguments from my end:
  1. RTI was never your pet project. It was because of the members of civil society, you were forced to pass that law.
  2. Lokpal, you should be ashamed of yourself to tell that Congress passed the bill. We all know what happened to Shri Anna Hazare and co. while they forced you to pass it.
  3. Ajit Pawar is still your partner even after irrigation scam.
  4. Lalu is still your partner after he was indicted with scam.
  5. Ashok Chavan still have a ticket for Lok Sabha election.
  6. You still have candidates that are disgrace to India. One of your candidate even said that inflation is because poor people have started eating more.
  7. People like Digvijay Singh and Kapil Sibal makes me realize that a rickshaw puller is better as a minister. At most, the rickshaw puller will not say and do anything.
  8. The best is Rahul Gandhi. I have no words to describe his talents (sarcasm).

I hope to never see you in power in my life time.



You all must be knowing the status of Maharashtra politics as nothing is behind the curtains. I am not going to talk about every single thing but specifically about a party which just started making it’s stand on the various issues. Absolutly right, I am talking about MAHARASHTRA NAVNIRMAN SENA led by Raj Thackeray.

Raj Thackeray, this name might incite different feelings in the minds of the readers and the people of India but after some analysis he changed my negative feelings into positive. I have been reading a lot about Raj through various news articles, watching news channels and reading other blogs. All these things made me think that Raj Thackeray is a menace to the society and he should be banned. I started a conversation with people around me over this topic and they enlightened me by showing me the facts about the society and why Raj is being supported by the common man. As it is rightly said, half knowledge is always dangerous. I always read the stories published by the media but never gave a chance to Raj to justify himself. So I decided to watch all the public meeting videos held by Raj and uploaded on youtube. After knowing the complete story, I support Raj and if possible (if the party objectives are followed) will join his party, in future. Today I am going to explain my understanding about his policies, his party’s objective (not sure whether it will be followed or not) and how it can help us. I am not inspired by the way he executes his plans or his actions. (Just thought of drawing a line in what I believe and what I don’t.)

First what he indents to do:

1) He just wants to concentrate on Maharashtra and work towards its development. He does not want to think about other states. I some how agrees to his ideology. A country is divided into state for proper functioning and if every minister starts thinking about his state then all the states in India will develop which indirectly helps in development of a nation.

2) He wants to maintain a different status of Maharashtra as other states have been successful in maintaining it. For e.g. he wants that every person in Maharashtra should speak Marathi. I don’t feel this is too much to ask. He is just trying to follow what other states are doing. Every person in Gujrat speaks Gujarati, every one in Tamilnadu speaks Tamil and everyone in Andhra Pradesh speaks Telugu. If we move to any of these states, we have to learn this language to communicate with common man and he wants the exact same thing with Maharashtra.

3) He doesn’t want that students in Maharashtra should only go to Marathi schools but what he really wants that in Maharashtra, Marathi should not be an optional language. Every student should learn Marathi and English from 1st standard.

4) He doesn’t want to be like Sharad Pawar who does every thing for his constituency irrespective of Maharashtra. Sharad Pawar pulled every strings to bring water to Baramati irrespective of the condition of the rest of Maharashtra. Though he is leader from Maharashtra, his Maharashtra is only limited till Baramati. But Raj Thackeray indends to work towards betterment of the entire Maharashtra.

5) He vilified against Bacchhans just becase he wants that Bacchhans should do similar things that he did for Uttar Pradesh (please listen to his speech on you tube to know the details). He says that when Bacchhan can be loyal to his state even after so many years, then why Raj Thackeray is bad if he follows the same thing.

There are many other things that can be appreciated about Raj Thaceray. I feel that he is the leader which can help Maharashtra to develop like Gujarat. He is an excellent orator and he mesmerizes the audiences. If he follows what he preches then believe me we have an excellent leader that we can rely on and expect an all round development of Maharashtra.

After listening to him, even I decided to speak in Marathi (This must be schoking to my friends)

Some of the videos that I recommened:

(there are around 11 parts)

(around 6 parts)